Script 'mail_helper' called by obssrc
Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package postgresql11 for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2023-11-09 21:36:16
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/postgresql11 (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.postgresql11.new.17445 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "postgresql11"

Thu Nov  9 21:36:16 2023 rev:32 rq:1124720 version:11.22

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/postgresql11/postgresql11.changes        
2023-10-31 20:26:51.244483929 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.postgresql11.new.17445/postgresql11.changes     
2023-11-09 21:36:35.219519318 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,32 @@
+Thu Nov  9 12:03:30 UTC 2023 - Reinhard Max <m...@suse.com>
+
+- Update to 11.22:
+  * bsc#1216962, CVE-2023-5868: Fix handling of unknown-type
+    arguments in DISTINCT "any" aggregate functions. This error led
+    to a text-type value being interpreted as an unknown-type value
+    (that is, a zero-terminated string) at runtime. This could
+    result in disclosure of server memory following the text value.
+  * bsc#1216961, CVE-2023-5869: Detect integer overflow while
+    computing new array dimensions. When assigning new elements to
+    array subscripts that are outside the current array bounds, an
+    undetected integer overflow could occur in edge cases. Memory
+    stomps that are potentially exploitable for arbitrary code
+    execution are possible, and so is disclosure of server memory.
+  * bsc#1216960, CVE-2023-5870: Prevent the pg_signal_backend role
+    from signalling background workers and autovacuum processes.
+    The documentation says that pg_signal_backend cannot issue
+    signals to superuser-owned processes. It was able to signal
+    these background  processes, though, because they advertise a
+    role OID of zero. Treat that as indicating superuser ownership.
+    The security implications of cancelling one of these process
+    types are fairly small so far as the core code goes (we'll just
+    start another one), but extensions might add background workers
+    that are more vulnerable.
+    Also ensure that the is_superuser parameter is set correctly in
+    such processes. No specific security consequences are known for
+    that oversight, but it might be significant for some extensions.
+  * Add support for LLVM 16 and 17
+  * https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/2749
+  * https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/release-11-22.html 
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  postgresql-11.21.tar.bz2
  postgresql-11.21.tar.bz2.sha256

New:
----
  postgresql-11.22.tar.bz2
  postgresql-11.22.tar.bz2.sha256

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ postgresql11.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.b9BwtE/_old  2023-11-09 21:36:35.911544868 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.b9BwtE/_new  2023-11-09 21:36:35.915545016 +0100
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 #
 
 
-%define pgversion 11.21
+%define pgversion 11.22
 %define pgmajor 11
 %define buildlibs 0
 %define tarversion %{pgversion}

++++++ postgresql-11.21.tar.bz2 -> postgresql-11.22.tar.bz2 ++++++
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/postgresql11/postgresql-11.21.tar.bz2 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.postgresql11.new.17445/postgresql-11.22.tar.bz2 
differ: char 11, line 1

++++++ postgresql-11.21.tar.bz2.sha256 -> postgresql-11.22.tar.bz2.sha256 ++++++
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/postgresql11/postgresql-11.21.tar.bz2.sha256     
2023-08-11 15:55:50.655873895 +0200
+++ 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.postgresql11.new.17445/postgresql-11.22.tar.bz2.sha256
  2023-11-09 21:36:35.203518728 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-07b0837471d5dd77b25166b34718f3ba10816b6ad61e691e6fc547cf3fcff850  
postgresql-11.21.tar.bz2
+2cb7c97d7a0d7278851bbc9c61f467b69c094c72b81740b751108e7892ebe1f0  
postgresql-11.22.tar.bz2

Reply via email to