tqchen commented on PR #95:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95#issuecomment-1339754681

   Thanks @mbaret. First of all, I have updated my original post and please 
read it through again. 
   
   > In such a situation, I would expect that with the combined resources of 
those eight organizations, they could address any concerns raised by the 
community through the standard process.  they'd first and foremost prioritize 
listening to and respecting the existing community.
   
   These people **are part of** the existing community. And existing community 
as a whole should work on listening and empowering each other. People 
contribute in different ways, code, documents, advocation, no one means would 
be superior to another one.
   
   > Resources and ability to go through process
   
   A lot of our discussions are about how we should operate as a community.
   
   Shall we always disallow new modules that have relevant features to coexist 
with existing ones? Should we outright reject the phased approach and always 
ask for a detailed plan before accepting a module? After considering the 
arguments, shall we empower community members so some of them can enjoy the new 
module, and help us to grow our developer community?
   
   There is no single perfect answer here, and we all need to evaluate things 
by considering all the factors. First of all, it is important to acknowledge 
that each of our views is both valid in many cases. It is very important to 
understand each others' view, and re-evaluate the proposal under such a 
context. 
   
   So while some of the concerns or ask from some of our members might seem 
valid, and it could be one way on how we operate things -- we should totally 
acknowledge that. The other ways of operating things are also valid. Simply 
stall in one case would implicitly mean that we reject the other way of 
operations that encourages moving things forward. 
    
   And we needs to lean into the community when choosing hows. There is a 
reason why ASF have tools to do enable procedural votes and our community 
brings up the process RFC. We are following that process.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to