Author: buildbot
Date: Fri Nov  8 16:28:39 2013
New Revision: 885895

Log:
Staging update by buildbot for accumulo

Modified:
    websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/   (props changed)
    websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/git.html

Propchange: websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Fri Nov  8 16:28:39 2013
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1539515
+1540108

Modified: websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/git.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/git.html (original)
+++ websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/git.html Fri Nov  8 16:28:39 2013
@@ -257,6 +257,18 @@ name. It has been suggested to name the 
 Maven releases are named. In other words, the branch just created would be
 named <code>1.4.4-snapshot</code> or similar.</p>
 <h3 id="reviewing-contributor-changes">Reviewing contributor changes</h3>
+<p>It is always the responsibility of committers to determine that a patch is
+intended and able to be contributed.  From the
+<a href="http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cla";>new 
committer's guide</a>:
+"Please take care to ensure that patches are original works which have been
+clearly contributed to the ASF in public. In the case of any doubt (or when a
+contribution with a more complex history is presented) please consult your
+project PMC before committing it."</p>
+<p>Extra diligence may be necessary when code is contributed via a pull 
request.
+Committers should verify that the contributor intended to submit the code as a 
+Contribution under the <a 
href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt";>Apache License</a>.
+When pulling the code, committers should also verify that the commits pulled 
match the 
+list of commits sent to the Accumulo dev list in the pull request.</p>
 <p><strong>Patches</strong> -- Developers should use the following steps to 
apply patches from
 contributors:</p>
 <ol>


Reply via email to