[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13218374#comment-13218374
 ] 

J.W. Janssen commented on ACE-223:
----------------------------------

Using the service ranking for that would work as well, I agree.

The service.id would be something of a last resort to get a predictable order 
during the lifetime of the container, when nothing is specified for the service 
ranking (or any other used service property). 


                
> Undefined order of UIExtensionFactories 
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACE-223
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-223
>             Project: ACE
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Web UI
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: J.W. Janssen
>
> You can register multiple UIExtensionFactories for a NamedObject's editor. 
> However, their order isn't defined and changes continuously. Needless to say 
> that this is annoying to the end user/administrator.
> We should provide a default ordering (for example on the service.id of 
> registered UIExtensionFactory), but also allow custom ordering to be defined 
> explicitly, for example by adding a service-property.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to