[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bree Van Oss updated ACE-512:
-----------------------------
Description:
Non-Java OSGi artifacts whose names do not end in a version number, in the form
dash number (e.g. some-artifact-1.0.zip) are silently ignored by the ACE
repo:cd Gogo command.
Presently we are attempting to use ACE to provision several non-Java OSGi
artifacts. Each of these components has a different artifact naming convention
and none of the conventions conform what ACE (or BND) expects. We do not have
control over the name of one artifact type (RPM) and I believe it will be
fairly difficult to overcome this obstacle by simply working around the issue
on our end.
A bit more detail...
The following filter is used, however when the "version" attribute is not
specified, the filter fails and the artifact is consequently filtered out
filter: (&(osgi.identity=*)(version=*)(type=*))
The following method call results in the non-conforming artifacts being
filtered out.
Map<Requirement, Collection<Capability>> sourceResources =
repository.findProviders(Collections.singleton(requirement));
The following trace was as deep as I could step into the issue.
FrameworkUtil$FilterImpl.match(Dictionary<String,?>) line: 418
CapabilityIndex.appendMatchingCapabilities(Requirement, Collection<Capability>)
line: 50
AceObrRepository(AbstractIndexedRepo).findProviders(Collection<Requirement>)
line: 332
RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, Requirement) line: 296
RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, String, String, String) line: 285
RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, String, String) line: 278
ContinuousDeployer.deployResources() line: 68
RepoCommands.cd(CommandRepo, CommandRepo, CommandRepo) line: 136
... (more)
was:
Non-Java OSGi artifacts whose names do not end in a version number, in the form
dash number (e.g. some-artifact-1.0.zip) are silently ignored by the ACE
repo:cd Gogo command.
Presently we are attempting to use ACE to provision several non-Java OSGi
artifacts. Each of these components has a different artifact naming convention
and none of the conventions conform what ACE (or BND) expects. We do not have
control over the name of one artifact type (RPM) and I believe it will be
fairly difficult to overcome this obstacle by simply working around the issue
on our end.
A bit more detail follows.
The following filter is used, however when the "version" attribute is not
specified, the filter fails and the artifact is consequently filtered out
filter: (&(osgi.identity=*)(version=*)(type=*))
Map<Requirement, Collection<Capability>> sourceResources =
repository.findProviders(Collections.singleton(requirement));
FrameworkUtil$FilterImpl.match(Dictionary<String,?>) line: 418
CapabilityIndex.appendMatchingCapabilities(Requirement, Collection<Capability>)
line: 50
AceObrRepository(AbstractIndexedRepo).findProviders(Collection<Requirement>)
line: 332
RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, Requirement) line: 296
RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, String, String, String) line: 285
RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, String, String) line: 278
ContinuousDeployer.deployResources() line: 68
RepoCommands.cd(CommandRepo, CommandRepo, CommandRepo) line: 136
... (more)
> Custom artifacts not following naming convention are ignored by repo:cd Gogo
> command
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACE-512
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-512
> Project: ACE
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Repository
> Affects Versions: 2.0.1
> Environment: OS X 10.10.1 with Java 8
> java version "1.8.0_25"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_25-b17)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.25-b02, mixed mode)
> Reporter: Bree Van Oss
> Priority: Minor
>
> Non-Java OSGi artifacts whose names do not end in a version number, in the
> form dash number (e.g. some-artifact-1.0.zip) are silently ignored by the ACE
> repo:cd Gogo command.
> Presently we are attempting to use ACE to provision several non-Java OSGi
> artifacts. Each of these components has a different artifact naming
> convention and none of the conventions conform what ACE (or BND) expects. We
> do not have control over the name of one artifact type (RPM) and I believe it
> will be fairly difficult to overcome this obstacle by simply working around
> the issue on our end.
> A bit more detail...
> The following filter is used, however when the "version" attribute is not
> specified, the filter fails and the artifact is consequently filtered out
> filter: (&(osgi.identity=*)(version=*)(type=*))
> The following method call results in the non-conforming artifacts being
> filtered out.
> Map<Requirement, Collection<Capability>> sourceResources =
> repository.findProviders(Collections.singleton(requirement));
> The following trace was as deep as I could step into the issue.
> FrameworkUtil$FilterImpl.match(Dictionary<String,?>) line: 418
> CapabilityIndex.appendMatchingCapabilities(Requirement,
> Collection<Capability>) line: 50
> AceObrRepository(AbstractIndexedRepo).findProviders(Collection<Requirement>)
> line: 332
> RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, Requirement) line: 296
> RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, String, String, String) line: 285
> RepositoryUtil.findResources(Repository, String, String) line: 278
> ContinuousDeployer.deployResources() line: 68
> RepoCommands.cd(CommandRepo, CommandRepo, CommandRepo) line: 136
> ... (more)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
