mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #4878: [AIRFLOW-4046] Added 
validations for poke_interval & timeout for Airflow Sensor
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4878#discussion_r264013375
 
 

 ##########
 File path: airflow/sensors/base_sensor_operator.py
 ##########
 @@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ def __init__(self,
                  *args,
                  **kwargs):
         super(BaseSensorOperator, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
+        if not isinstance(poke_interval, (int, float)) or poke_interval < 0:
 
 Review comment:
   In my opinion, if it is possible to say about a certain fragment of the code 
that it has a certain role, it is worth creating a method from this fragment. 
There are several reasons. First, the readability of the code. It is not 
complex, but the work on readability is a continuous process. In other places 
in the project, there are more complex methods that are better candidates for 
division, but we have to start with something. Second, small methods have the 
role of additional documentation. Third, this is just a practice that we follow 
in my team and it is worth spreading it. This is not a new idea that does not 
exist. This is the choice between two equivalent ways.
   
   It is worth remembering that this is a small matter.  This should not 
prevent from merging, but only serve as a guide on how to write a code.  If you 
have time and you want it, you can improve it. This code is good enough to be 
accepted without changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to