potiuk commented on issue #11879: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11879#issuecomment-723925694
Cool. I will try to prepare small "starting point" description PR that might be a good starting point that we will iterate over during betas. On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:08 AM Pete DeJoy <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing I'd add is the inverse of the second question that @vikramkoka > <https://github.com/vikramkoka> posed above- if I'd like to upgrade > Airflow, how can I validate that the provider I'm installing will not > break? What does that experience look like both from the user perspective > and from the builder/maintainer perspective? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11879#issuecomment-723742005>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAERMI23GJAXZLDG6NVYUJTSO5TMJANCNFSM4TAP2IUA> > . > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
