potiuk commented on issue #15241: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15241#issuecomment-817106344
Hey everyone. Thanks to all who've already smoke-tested 9 of those providers :). We are progressing :) While it is not necessary and is not a blocker, I'd love to get at least some thumbs-up for just a basic testing of the changes for the remaining providers. We can't test them ourselves as we have no external services, but I thin it's much for you just installing it at whatever you have them and rough "looks good" should be ok (it's not a "stamp of approval", it's more "smoke test"). I'd love some comments on those: * hashicorp: @SangwanP https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp/1.0.2rc1/ * amazon: @dstandish, @uranusjr @blcksrx @markhopson @Visya @JavierLopezT @mmoyses @ferruzzi https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/1.3.0rc1/ * cncf.kubernetes: @ashb @akrava @dimberman @SamWheating https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/1.1.0rc1/ * microsoft.azure: @gmcrocetti https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/1.3.0rc1/ * salesforce: @jyotidhiman0610 https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-salesforce/2.0.0rc2/ * snowflake: @sunkickr https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/1.2.0rc1/ The google one was smoke tested by @fhoda (thanks!), but there were some other changes so if anyone has a chance I'd love some thumbs up (or down) from others as well: * google: @SamWheating @TobKed @sschaetz @jmcarp @radim94 https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/2.2.0rc1/ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
