r-richmond commented on pull request #11950: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11950#issuecomment-826395881
On python 3.9 I see you've opened https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15515. Should I rebase this PR on master or did you want to take over this pr with 15515? >"Let's use poetry - it will solve all our problems". That was 2 years ago. ... Happy to brainstorm on that - but rather that 'use XXX' I would love to see that someone implements it. I.e. "this is how the tool solves this two problems: Ty for the background; Given that I understand why airflow won't switch off of pip. That said what do you think of instead introducing tests that use poetry or pipenv to ensure that the requirements we have are always valid. i.e. the tests would run lock to make sure no conflicting requirements slip into airflow. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
