potiuk commented on issue #15933: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15933#issuecomment-847226686
> I am a little confused though. I see plyvel on the list of requirements Yeah. It will be released in the next wave of providers. And I also think the [plyvel] extra is a good option especially that this is really just a dependency. The plyvel provider is still there it will just fail with missing import if it's not installed with extra (same as a number of other cases, where we have cross-provider dependency. > Or maybe, they are happy that somebody has fixed those dependencies so that they match each other? Yeah. I am a bit torn myself. I see a value in having the "google" provider to get "everything-google". It it 'biggish" but on the other hand, it's also a kind of "good" to promote the whole platform (no need to install anything else to use "another" Google operator - it's the same with AWS (though there are far less number of of operators) and a bit different in Microsoft as there are really different "domains" there (winrm, mssql, azure). Actually I like the idea of the poll from @anitakar ! Just a thought... Maybe we can use Airflow Summit to run a number of mini-pols where we could prepare a list of such questions and make people more engaged? That could be one of a number of questions that we could ask. I will raise it to Airflow Summit organizers :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
