Jorricks commented on a change in pull request #16554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16554#discussion_r656032477
##########
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##########
@@ -186,13 +186,18 @@ def serialize_to_json(
if cls._is_excluded(value, key, object_to_serialize):
continue
- if key in decorated_fields:
- serialized_object[key] = cls._serialize(value)
- else:
- value = cls._serialize(value)
- if isinstance(value, dict) and "__type" in value:
+ value = cls._serialize(value)
+ if key not in decorated_fields and isinstance(value, dict) and
"__type" in value:
+ # Extra check to make sure for custom operators or dags that
the non-standard
+ # serialized_fields still support non-primitive types (e.g.
dicts).
+ if isinstance(object_to_serialize, DAG) and key in
DAG.get_serialized_fields():
+ value = value["__var"]
+ elif (
+ isinstance(object_to_serialize, BaseOperator)
+ and key in BaseOperator.get_serialized_fields()
+ ):
Review comment:
Anyway, what do you think of changing the code to:
```python
if key in DAG.get_serialized_fields() | BaseOperator.get_serialized_fields():
```
This would still allow for complex custom values as long as they are not
within either `DAG` or `BaseOperator`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
