jbkc85 commented on issue #13542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13542#issuecomment-877542235


   > This is also why I increased the `parallelism` option to 1000 and 
increased the `pool` size.
   
   ooh, so it wasn't just the pool size.  That makes more sense on why it 
worked.
   
   That being said, @caleboverman I think stumbled onto a great solution that 
not only eliminates the potential of (when this is fixed) parallelism, when 
airflow fixes the issue, ends up scheduling so many processes it takes down the 
Airflow box itself.  The gist of it, is just create more pools and use the 
pools as a way to help queue processes.  This of course works when you have a 
smaller installation, but really helped our stuff go through after we 
implemented the solution.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to