cansjt edited a comment on issue #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17022#issuecomment-891787393
With Airflow 2.1.2 we are something similar but not identical:
```
Task failed with exception", "exc_info": "Traceback (most recent call last):
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/airflow/models/taskinstance.py\", line
1157, in _run_raw_task
self._prepare_and_execute_task_with_callbacks(context, task)
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/airflow/models/taskinstance.py\", line
1331, in _prepare_and_execute_task_with_callbacks
result = self._execute_task(context, task_copy)
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/airflow/models/taskinstance.py\", line
1361, in _execute_task
result = task_copy.execute(context=context)
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/airflow/operators/python.py\", line
150, in execute
return_value = self.execute_callable()
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/airflow/operators/python.py\", line
161, in execute_callable
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args, **self.op_kwargs)
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/aggregator/tasks/airflow.py\", line
58, in __call__
super().__call__(execution_date + timedelta(days=1), **context)
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/aggregator/tasks/__init__.py\", line
103, in __call__
start_date, end_date = self._period(execution_date, **context)
File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/aggregator/retention.py\",
line 189, in __call__
lower_bounds, upper_bounds = zip(*[w(execution_date, **context) for w in
self._windows])
File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/aggregator/retention.py\",
line 189, in <listcomp>
lower_bounds, upper_bounds = zip(*[w(execution_date, **context) for w in
self._windows])
File
\"/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/aggregator/tasks/airflow.py\", line
77, in __call__
if task_instance is None or
task_instance.previous_execution_date_success is None:
AttributeError: 'TaskInstance' object has no attribute
'previous_execution_date_success'
```
The code triggering the execution is this
```python
class FromLastRunWindow(TimeWindow):
def __init__(self, *, clamp: bool = True, **kwargs):
super().__init__(**kwargs)
self._clamp = clamp
def __call__(self, execution_date: datetime, **context) ->
Tuple[datetime, datetime]:
upper = datetime.max
if self._clamp:
upper = self._fix_date(execution_date)
task_instance = context.get('task_instance')
if task_instance is None or
task_instance.previous_execution_date_success is None: # Raises here
return datetime.min, upper
return
datetime.combine(task_instance.previous_execution_date_success.date(),
time(0, 0, 0, 0)), upper
```
This is an auxiliary function we use in various tasks, as follows:
```python
def python_operator_callable(execution_date, **context):
start, end = FromLastRunWindow()(execution_date, **context)
# Proceed with the tasks operations ...
```
Works fine with 1.10.15. Looking at the documentation (versions 1.10.15,
2.0.0 & 2.12) it seems the `TaskInstance.previous_execution_date_success` has
simply been removed, without any deprecation notice. And the proper way to
retrieve the same info is the new API @josh-fell used in is example (the
`TaskInstance.get_previous_execution_date()` method)
So the question is more will this be a *wontfix*, forcing anyone depending
on this to update their code or is it worth a PR ? Something more or less like:
```py
class TaskInstance(...):
@property
def previous_execution_date_success(self):
"""The execution_date of the instance of this of this task from
latest succesful dag run.
.. deprecated:: 2.1.3
This property will be removed in Airflow 2.y.0
"""
warnings.warn('The `TasksInstance.previous_execution_date_success`
has been deprecated '
'and will be removed in Airflow 2.y.0. Use '
'TaskInstance.get_previous_execution_date(state=State.SUCCESS)` instead.',
DeprecationWarning)
return self.get_previous_execution_date(state=State.SUCCESS)
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]