uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17839#discussion_r700016667



##########
File path: airflow/api_connexion/openapi/v1.yaml
##########
@@ -604,6 +604,41 @@ paths:
         '404':
           $ref: '#/components/responses/NotFound'
 
+  /dags/{dag_id}/dagRuns/{dag_run_id}/state:
+    parameters:
+      - $ref: '#/components/parameters/DAGID'
+      - $ref: '#/components/parameters/DAGRunID'
+
+    post:
+      summary: Set a state of DAG run
+      description: >
+        Set a state of DAG run

Review comment:
       ```suggestion
         description: Set a state of DAG run
   ```
   
   (Nitpicking) don’t need to extra wrap.

##########
File path: tests/api_connexion/endpoints/test_dag_run_endpoint.py
##########
@@ -1154,3 +1156,111 @@ def test_should_raises_403_unauthorized(self):
             environ_overrides={'REMOTE_USER': "test_view_dags"},
         )
         assert response.status_code == 403
+
+
+class TestPostSetDagRunState(TestDagRunEndpoint):
+    @parameterized.expand([("failed",), ("success",)])
+    @freeze_time(TestDagRunEndpoint.default_time)
+    def test_should_respond_200(self, state):
+        dag_id = "TEST_DAG_ID"
+        dag_run_id = "TEST_DAG_RUN_ID_1"
+        test_time = timezone.parse(self.default_time)
+        with create_session() as session:
+            dag = DagModel(dag_id=dag_id)
+            dag_run = DagRun(
+                dag_id=dag_id,
+                run_id=dag_run_id,
+                state=DagRunState.RUNNING,
+                run_type=DagRunType.MANUAL,
+                execution_date=test_time,
+                start_date=test_time,
+                external_trigger=True,
+            )
+            session.add(dag)
+            session.add(dag_run)

Review comment:
       It’s probably easier to use the `dag_maker` fixture for this (but the 
current implementation is OK).

##########
File path: airflow/api_connexion/schemas/dag_run_schema.py
##########
@@ -104,6 +105,12 @@ def autofill(self, data, **kwargs):
         return data
 
 
+class SetDagRunStateFormSchema(Schema):
+    """Schema for handling the request of setting state of DAG run"""
+
+    state = DagStateField(validate=validate.OneOf([State.SUCCESS, 
State.FAILED]))

Review comment:
       Nitpick: Use `DagRunState.SUCCESS.value` (and `FAILED`) instead.

##########
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_run_endpoint.py
##########
@@ -271,3 +275,29 @@ def post_dag_run(dag_id, session):
         )
 
     raise AlreadyExists(detail=f"DAGRun with DAG ID: '{dag_id}' and DAGRun ID: 
'{run_id}' already exists")
+
+
[email protected]_access(
+    [
+        (permissions.ACTION_CAN_READ, permissions.RESOURCE_DAG),
+        (permissions.ACTION_CAN_EDIT, permissions.RESOURCE_DAG_RUN),
+    ]
+)
+@provide_session
+def update_dag_run_state(dag_id: str, dag_run_id: str, session) -> dict:
+    """Set a state of a dag run."""
+    dag_run: Optional[DagRun] = (
+        session.query(DagRun).filter(DagRun.dag_id == dag_id, DagRun.run_id == 
dag_run_id).one_or_none()
+    )
+    if dag_run is None:
+        error_message = f'Dag Run id {dag_run_id} not found in dag {dag_id}'
+        raise NotFound(error_message)
+    try:
+        post_body = set_dagrun_state_form_schema.load(request.json)
+    except ValidationError as err:
+        raise BadRequest(detail=str(err))
+
+    state = post_body['state']
+    dag_run.set_state(state=DagRunState(state).value)

Review comment:
       ```suggestion
       dag_run.set_state(state=DagRunState(state))
   ```
   
   `set_state` accepts a `DagRunState`, not `str`.

##########
File path: airflow/api_connexion/openapi/v1.yaml
##########
@@ -1996,6 +2031,16 @@ components:
       required:
         - dag_id
 
+    UpdateDagRunState:
+      type: object
+      properties:
+        state:
+          description: The state to set this DagRun
+          type: string
+          enum:
+            - success
+            - failed

Review comment:
       I wonder if it makes sense to set the state to other valid values. But I 
guess those can be added later if someone asks for them, so they should not 
block this PR.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to