potiuk edited a comment on issue #18323: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18323#issuecomment-921805978
> One minor thought (aside from we obviously can’t show this error for `airflow db upgrade`) is maybe we need to provide an override mechanism for local development, it’s occasionally useful knowingly run things without full migration (to fix an existing migration for example). Yep. Good call. And yeah. I was toying with the thought of enabling the check for `airflow db upgrade` just for the fun of it. I was thinking about adding it first and seeing if someone will find it during the review ;). But you spoiled my sneaky plan TP -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
