uranusjr commented on pull request #18685: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18685#issuecomment-933471688
+1 to moving it out (IIRC there are a few more others in the similar situation), but `airflow.utils` feels wrong to me. The function depends on things in `airflow.models` which depends on many things in `airflow.utils`, and this circular relationship may produce issues down the road. Something like `airflow.operations` or even `airflow.trigger_dags` would be better. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
