potiuk commented on issue #505: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/issues/505#issuecomment-962693946
I don't think it's OK. I just think that if we did it wrongly in the past and fixed it in recent releases after we were made aware of it - we do not have to retroactively fix it. We did it wrong. This is clear. Do we have to fix it in the past - I don't think so - but if you think otherwise - feel free to start a thread about it and ask. I feel no need to ask but if you do - it's all yours. J. On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 11:34 PM sebbASF ***@***.***> wrote: > What makes you think that it is OK to link to binaries and not provide a > link to the source that was used to create the binary? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/issues/505#issuecomment-962693223>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAERMIY4Y7WPY6AY2TY2P6DUK35I5ANCNFSM5HNSA2UA> > . > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
