uranusjr opened a new issue #19533: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19533
### Description https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19519#issuecomment-965621090 > Also I think we have a new "dags reserialize" coming - #19471 - which is really good idea because the "serialized" form of DAGs is pretty safe to delete and recreate. > I just wonder if this is not something that we should always do after/during upgrade "just in case". It might slow-down initial dag refresh, but at least we can be sure that everything in serialized dags is "correct". Recording this in a new issue so it doesn’t get forgotten. ### Use case/motivation _No response_ ### Related issues A way to manually trigger DAG reserialisation: #19471 If a previous-serialised DAG is not being compatible with new semantics, a bug can be raised at a confusing location: #19519 ### Are you willing to submit a PR? - [X] Yes I am willing to submit a PR! ### Code of Conduct - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
