potiuk commented on pull request #20066: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20066#issuecomment-992782061
> * 1. Breeze is installed in editable mode. > * [x] 2. Script is generated and added to zsh and got it working by running `source ~/.zshrc` > * [x] 3. Created a new command to breeze and it's working in autocomplete. > As far as I have seen the generated scripts for bash/zsh/fish, it doesn't seem to vary if we add a new command in `breeze.py`. The content of the auto-generate activation scripts remains the same. Only if we change the command name from `Breeze2` to something different, then we may need to regenerate the activation scripts and update in bash/zsh/fish. Not sure about how powershell would work in this case. Cool. So I think you can scrap all the pre-commit work and simply get this working and documented with "generation". BTW. This is a normal part of the process. It's perfectly OK to develop something and get it almost working only to find out that there is an easier/better way of solving the problem. But the learning is there, you found out why things are more difficult than you thought and usually the second time you start implementing it you will do it in 1/3 of the time, as you will start with the experience you learned :). Code is often liability not an asset and throwing it out is sometimes best you can do with it (eventually whole Bash Breeze will be thrown out this way!) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
