dimon222 commented on a change in pull request #19726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19726#discussion_r768204827
##########
File path:
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/backcompat/backwards_compat_converters.py
##########
@@ -21,18 +21,16 @@
from kubernetes.client import ApiClient, models as k8s
from airflow.exceptions import AirflowException
-from airflow.providers.cncf.kubernetes.backcompat.pod import Port, Resources
-from airflow.providers.cncf.kubernetes.backcompat.pod_runtime_info_env import
PodRuntimeInfoEnv
-def _convert_kube_model_object(obj, old_class, new_class):
+def _convert_kube_model_object(obj, new_class):
convert_op = getattr(obj, "to_k8s_client_obj", None)
if callable(convert_op):
return obj.to_k8s_client_obj()
Review comment:
I guess thats a problem of the fact that Resources and Port are combined
together under not straightforward named "pod.py", otherwise the filename
itself should describe the exact concerning class (ala resources.py and
port.py). But you're right, its better be handled separately in #20031. So,
should we merge current PR then as is?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
