dbarrundiag commented on PR #22692: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22692#issuecomment-1087466753
IMHO I would think if we are creating an Airflow Provider for `delta-sharing`, then to have the actual `delta-sharing` package as a dependency is totally fair. Specially if that means that the logic in the airflow provider does not have to re-implement all the features that the `delta-sharing` package has already. Additionally, at the moment there are only 2 use-cases for this provider but in the future there might be more that will also leverage the features `delta-sharing` provides. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
