tobianton opened a new issue, #22986: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22986
### Apache Airflow Provider(s) microsoft-azure ### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure==3.7.2 apache-airflow-providers-amazon==3.2.0 apache-airflow-providers-celery==2.1.3 apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==3.0.0 apache-airflow-providers-docker==2.5.2 apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch==2.2.0 apache-airflow-providers-ftp==2.1.2 apache-airflow-providers-google==6.7.0 apache-airflow-providers-grpc==2.0.4 apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp==2.1.4 apache-airflow-providers-http==2.1.2 apache-airflow-providers-imap==2.2.3 apache-airflow-providers-mysql==2.2.3 apache-airflow-providers-odbc==2.0.4 apache-airflow-providers-postgres==4.1.0 apache-airflow-providers-redis==2.0.4 apache-airflow-providers-sendgrid==2.0.4 apache-airflow-providers-sftp==2.5.2 apache-airflow-providers-slack==4.2.3 apache-airflow-providers-sqlite==2.1.3 apache-airflow-providers-ssh==2.4.3 ### Apache Airflow version 2.2.5 (latest released) ### Operating System Server: Docker Desktop 4.7.0 (77141) & apache/airflow:2.2.5-python3.9 ### Deployment Docker-Compose ### Deployment details _No response_ ### What happened I see from the [docs](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/operators/container_instances.py) that the **AzureContainerInstancesOperator** accepts a "container_timeout" parameter (of type timedelta?). When I supply the argument to the AzureContainerInstancesOperator my DAG serialization fails. ### What you think should happen instead Either the argument should be removed from the docs: - [Source1](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/stable/_api/airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/operators/container_instances/index.html) - [Source2](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/operators/container_instances.py) Or the argument should be re-introduced. I'm hoping for the latter outcome as it would make the "cost control" kickback from my employer go over a lot smoother in our cloudification of an old Airflow instance. ### How to reproduce _No response_ ### Anything else _No response_ ### Are you willing to submit PR? - [X] Yes I am willing to submit a PR! ### Code of Conduct - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
