jedcunningham commented on issue #23472: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23472#issuecomment-1118722834
Happy to hear it. Thanks for testing it out @TPapajCin! Just for some extra clarity, the inefficient query was part of the pre-migration checks which would have automatically moved those bad rows @ldacey ran into into a separate table. You actually skipped the inefficient query completely with how you upgraded, but you got to the same place at the end of the day (`airflow db upgrade` just would have done it without manual intervention). In case you don't know, you can also easily get a patch file directly from github. Just add `.patch` to the end of the url, e.g. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23458.patch You can then apply it with `patch`. The fix is already slated for 2.3.1 which should be coming pretty soon here, so I'm going to close this issue. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
