potiuk commented on issue #17010: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17010#issuecomment-1146774178
Sorry for my "harsh" words too. It's just too often people approach free software as somethig that is "magically" maintained and that they might "demand" and "expect" things to happen. Sometimes the written communication is very difficult to pass your real intentions and attitude :) And in this case - really PR is the best way to attempt new rule creation. Having PR opened, would also give you (or creator of the PR whoever that person is) an opportunity to see how the rules are implement and understand it better and sometimes it might end up with ... not creating the PR at all after realising that either you can do it differently or that there are some performance/complexity implications that are difficult to reason about without writing the code. It just a little investment. of time to make further dicusssions more productive. This is great example when the code to implement and analysis how it works is not a huge effort and even if the code resulting from it would be dumped eventually it's a good learning and best use of time for everyone. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
