mik-laj commented on code in PR #23905: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23905#discussion_r889520122
########## docs/apache-airflow/logging-monitoring/check-health.rst: ########## @@ -72,6 +72,18 @@ status of the application. The return code is only indicative of the state of th monitoring, then in case of failure of the web server, you will lose the ability to monitor scheduler, which means that it can be restarted even if it is in good condition. For greater confidence, consider using :ref:`CLI Check for Scheduler <check-health/cli-checks-for-scheduler>`. +.. _check-health/scheduler-health-check-server: + +Scheduler Health Check Server Review Comment: Can you update section "Health Check Endpoint" so that the user does not confuse the health control for the scheduler with the health control for the webserver? Now the user may think that the health check for the scheduler is a subtype of the scheduler for the webserver, but that is a separate feature. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
