potiuk commented on issue #24422: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24422#issuecomment-1156330932
> As for the provider name i just wondered if it should be provider sql or provider core with sql as extra. Just for the case where we might want to extract other core operators/hooks/sensors into provider(?) Interesting idea, however extras are "evil". I'd say `apache-airflow-providers-core-sql` is better approach. This will allow independent release of similar features - we avoid the fate of "google" provider this way, where things that are "loosely" related (i.e. by google) will be actually coupled when it comes to releasing them. I can easily imagine if we have (for example) `core-storage' and `core-sql` that we would like to release only "core-sql` with a new feature, without touching 'core-storage`.. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
