dstandish commented on PR #25410: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25410#issuecomment-1208204404
> @dstandish - the failing test in "providers 2.2" indicates backwards-incompatible changes in providers I am afraid. Ah... yes... this makes sense.... because... airflow 2.2 won't have new `schedule` param.... will have to come up with something for backcompat in the example dags stored in providers. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
