dstandish commented on code in PR #26509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26509#discussion_r980261032
##########
airflow/models/dag.py:
##########
@@ -1189,11 +1195,25 @@ def relative_fileloc(self) -> pathlib.Path:
"""File location of the importable dag 'file' relative to the
configured DAGs folder."""
path = pathlib.Path(self.fileloc)
try:
- return path.relative_to(settings.DAGS_FOLDER)
+ rel_path = path.relative_to(self.dag_processor_dags_folder or
settings.DAGS_FOLDER)
+ if rel_path == pathlib.Path('.'):
+ return path
+ else:
+ return rel_path
except ValueError:
# Not relative to DAGS_FOLDER.
return path
+ @property
+ def dag_processor_dags_folder(self):
Review Comment:
@potiuk
> I believe (please correct me if I misundderstood it @dstandish) that this
PR here was very similar to what the
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16860 change for @ashb was. But while
Ashb wanted to resurrect the relative approach working for the main DAGS
folder, but this one was to bring it to the standalone DAG processor.
Not quite.... the "change" here is not really a change, it's fixing the
regression in 2.4 of that same exact feature. It's not specific to dag
processor. This issue appears even just using scheduler with virtualenv and
k8s exec --- no dags processor process required.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]