potiuk commented on code in PR #26759: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26759#discussion_r984147066
########## docs/apache-airflow/production-deployment.rst: ########## @@ -222,6 +222,29 @@ you can exchange the Google Cloud Platform identity to the Amazon Web Service id which effectively means access to Amazon Web Service platform. For more information, see: :ref:`howto/connection:aws:gcp-federation` + +Applying patches from ``main`` +============================== + +On occasion, a user may want to apply a patch from ``main`` which has not yet made it into a release. Assuming you want to apply a specific PR to one of the official airflow images, you can apply roughly as follows. It's also possible to apply a specific commit. + +.. code-block:: docker Review Comment: One other thaught i had. By ASF rules In principle we should not tell end users in the user's docs that they should use main code. This is not really what regular users should ever be encouraged to do - because technically speaking code that has not been released and voted on is not official user code. But it would be great if we can have a link that we can send the users who are opening GitHub issues and looking at the GitHub repo. So why don't we make it part of GitHub repo doc only instead of 'user docs'? That would basically remove all the potential problems i pointed out. It's less 'official', would not need testing and would definitely cater to 'power users' only. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
