bolkedebruin commented on PR #26486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26486#issuecomment-1307644237

   @potiuk quoting yourself `And let me explain this. I also think the current 
way it is presented is wrong. ` 
(https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26486#issuecomment-1254134155). @BasPH 
proposed a way that at least makes it consistent (i.e. chooses classic) and put 
the effort in. You can do a follow up with a tabbed approach (I like it). We 
can then decide if Taskflow comes first or Classic based on a discussion on the 
dev list.
   
   That discussion is where to focus in the future, but that should not stop us 
from improving the now. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27235 is great! 
But we should also not let its scope creep. That PR is about the structure and 
does not concern the content and how it is presented. Follow ups will happen to 
that PR.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to