hterik opened a new issue, #28186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/28186

   ### Apache Airflow version
   
   2.5.0
   
   ### What happened
   
   1. Start a task running with KubernetesExecutor
   2. Open the **_/rendered-k8s?dag_id=...&task_id=..._** endpoint in the web UI
   3. Copy the metadata.name 
   4. `kubectl logs pod/$name`
   5. `Error from server (NotFound): pods 
"example-sla-dag-sleep-20-1bc7f8d6892849eaac4642c4177e2eab" not found`
   
   By inspecting the 
   
   ### What you think should happen instead
   
   Pod name presented in **Rendered K8s Pod Spec** should match the pod name 
used for running task. Otherwise pod name should not be presented at all.
   
   
   This is not only a problem for users of the UI, also in the code it can be 
useful to have the real pod-id. 
   I'm in the process of troubleshooting strange errors with task adoption, 
where there are frequently orphaned tasks found. Currently there appears to be 
no way to go from TI to pod_id, the adoption-process instead goes the other 
way, using pod labels to find TIs. So for any TIs that were not found in the 
adoption, one can not find if they at any point have had matching pods or not.
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Operating System
   
   Ubuntu 22.04
   
   ### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Deployment
   
   Other Docker-based deployment
   
   ### Deployment details
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Anything else
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit PR?
   
   - [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to