potiuk commented on PR #29785: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/29785#issuecomment-1446936124
> The language as is seems to suggest that the database isn't backwards compatible; it should be backwards compatible, but it nonetheless probably shouldn't be directly accessed. Because that's what it is. We WANT to make backwards incompatible DB changes in the future (sometimes even in patchlevel releases). This is a clear intention we have. It was intentional and very clear and strong statement that you absolutely should not rely on database structure. We might decide to drop a field or rename it at any time. And we want to be very clear about it. This is also very clearly explained in the new page (that will be up in 2.6) that clearly explains what is (and what is not) public API interface that you can rely on - and the Database Structure is very clearly and specifically put in the "do not rely on it". Why do you thing -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
