potiuk commented on issue #29963: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/29963#issuecomment-1470947763
> I am aware that the pod no longer exists, but the logs are in the file system. > What I am trying to say is that airflow could recover the logs even if the pod has been deleted. No. It's wrong if you consider airflow's architecture. Instead, Airflow approach is to use remote logs. The problem is that Airflow Webserver might not have permissions nor access and can be completely shielded from Kubernetes to read the logs. Also Airflow Webserver works in a way that is independent which executor is used - and has to work in all circumstances, therefore remote loggging solution is the right approach. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
