wookiist opened a new issue, #30593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/30593

   ### Apache Airflow version
   
   2.5.3
   
   ### What happened
   
   I upgraded my airflow cluster from 2.5.2 to 2.5.3 , after which strange 
things started happening.
   I'm currently using a standalone dagProcessor, and the parsing time that 
used to take about 2 seconds has suddenly increased to about 10 seconds.
   I'm thinking it's weird because I haven't made any changes other than a 
version up, but is there something I can look into? Thanks in advance! 🙇🏼 
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16011260/231323427-e0d95506-c752-4a2b-93fc-9880b18814f3.png)
   
   
   ### What you think should happen instead
   
   I believe that the time it takes to parse a Dag should be constant, or at 
least have some variability, but shouldn't take as long as it does now.
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   If you cherrypick [this 
commit](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30079) into 2.5.2 stable code, 
the issue will recur.
   
   ### Operating System
   
   Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
   
   ### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Deployment
   
   Official Apache Airflow Helm Chart
   
   ### Deployment details
   
   - Kubernetes 1.21 Cluster
   - 1.7.0 helm chart
   - standalone dag processor
   - using kubernetes executor
   - using mysql database
   
   ### Anything else
   
   This issue still persists, and restarting the Dag Processor has not resolved 
the issue.
   
   ### Are you willing to submit PR?
   
   - [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to