eladkal commented on PR #30259: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30259#issuecomment-1518706485
> For me this requires to advocate (and lead implementation) of strategic solution by those who rejected this PR on the grounds that we need a more strategic solution. I call it "constructive criticism". But maybe it's just my understanding :). As I see it - this PR reduce severity of one problem yet it creates another one.My argument is the new problem is worst than the previous one. The PR does not solve the issue it hides it making it harder to spot and resolve. This would be a nightmare for cluster admins. Since I've been a cluster admin I can say a lot about that. What we do here is favoring specific user over other users. I'm not sure from where we gain the confidence that this is right? As for policies - if idea is in the right direction and one simply doesn't like it then I agree with you. This person needs to come up with something better or to not be in the way. This is not the case. I don't feel this PR is a step towards a solution. As I mentioned I am happy to be convinced otherwise. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
