hussein-awala commented on issue #31491: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31491#issuecomment-1568624539
@uranusjr In Airflow 1.x, the sub dag operator was completely different, it was based on backfill instead of scheduler, and I believe we used to clear the sub dag run when clearing the sub dag TIs. However, this behavior was modified in the [this PR](https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/0be39219cd058ba7d50cdf34b2cc46513f4f5ab3) , which introduced the logic to only clear the failed TIs. > This does not sound like something that’d change with refactoring and I wonder if “fixing” this would break someone that considered the 1.x behaviour as a bug. It appears that it was indeed something changed during the refactoring. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
