mis98zb commented on code in PR #32122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32122#discussion_r1255386212
##########
airflow/decorators/task_group.py:
##########
@@ -124,14 +124,14 @@ def partial(self, **kwargs: Any) ->
_TaskGroupFactory[FParams, FReturn]:
# TODO: fixme when mypy gets compatible with new attrs
return attr.evolve(self, partial_kwargs=kwargs) # type:
ignore[arg-type]
- def expand(self, **kwargs: OperatorExpandArgument) -> DAGNode:
+ def expand(self, concurrency_limit: int = None, **kwargs:
OperatorExpandArgument) -> DAGNode:
Review Comment:
Good idea!
This is consistent with the usage of max_active_tis_per_dagrun for task.
So is it better to use the parameter name as `max_active_tgs_per_dagrun`?
tgs may be not so good, but I did not find any work better...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
