jedcunningham commented on code in PR #32439: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32439#discussion_r1258621229
########## .github/SECURITY.md: ########## @@ -49,7 +60,11 @@ in other products/circumstances. Therefore, some potential security vulnerabilit apply to Airflow, or have a different severity than some generic scoring systems (for example `CVSS`) calculation suggests. -The [ASF Security team's page](https://www.apache.org/security/) describes +The security team (see below [Handling security issues in Airflow](https://github.com/apache/airflow/security#handling-security-issues-in-airflow)) will get back to Review Comment: See #32496. ########## .github/SECURITY.md: ########## @@ -49,7 +60,11 @@ in other products/circumstances. Therefore, some potential security vulnerabilit apply to Airflow, or have a different severity than some generic scoring systems (for example `CVSS`) calculation suggests. -The [ASF Security team's page](https://www.apache.org/security/) describes +The security team (see below [Handling security issues in Airflow](https://github.com/apache/airflow/security#handling-security-issues-in-airflow)) will get back to Review Comment: ```suggestion The Airflow security team will get back to ``` I say we leave this link out for now. I'm going to open a PR to move that section into another document. I think short/sweet here is a better approach. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
