haoch opened a new pull request, #32619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32619

   <!--
    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    distributed with this work for additional information
    regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
    Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    software distributed under the License is distributed on an
    "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
    KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
    specific language governing permissions and limitations
    under the License.
    -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
   are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
   remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   Feel free to ping committers for the review!
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   closes: #ISSUE
   related: #ISSUE
   
   How to write a good git commit message:
   http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   -->
   
   ---
   **^ Add meaningful description above**
   
   Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information.
   In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party 
License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a 
newsfragment file, named `{pr_number}.significant.rst` or 
`{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/newsfragments).
   
   **General problem**: `joinedload` on `TaskInstance.dag_run` is generally not 
needed except for UI/API (list all task instances and related fields at once), 
but the unnecessary `JOIN` is a killer of Airflow scheduling performance 
especially when there are thousands of task instances in single DagRun.
   
   **The real problem in some large scale Airflow clusters**: 
   We manage thousands of airflow executors (nodes) in production, and each 
DagRun may have 10k task instances. 
   
   * In Scheduler side , the impact is very obvious as after making it lazy, we 
do see 3+ times scheduling performance improvement. 
   
   * In Executor side, when tasks are queued and preparing to execute, it will 
check if dependencies meet with all finished task instances, a large amount of 
concurrent JOIN SQL will slow database performance. Especially when the config 
content size of some DagRun is large, thousands of concurrent executors will 
pull the same large DagRun at same time and it will also a  huge network 
throughput from database and make the whole cluster unhealthy. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to