kojiromike opened a new issue, #32917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32917

   ### Apache Airflow version
   
   2.6.3
   
   ### What happened
   
   `SlackWebhookOperator.__init__` has a default arg of `link_names=False`. 
Then, `SlackWebhookOperator.execute` calls SlackWebhookHook explicitly with 
`link_names=self.link_names`. So `SlackWebhookHook.__init__` always explicitly 
receives a kwarg named `link_names`, which triggers an unavoidable warning 
message.
   
   ### What you think should happen instead
   
   If the user did not instantiate `SlackWebhookOperator` with `link_names`, 
then `link_names` should not be passed to `SlackWebhookHook`. Then there would 
be no warning.
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   Call the `SlackWebhookOperator` without a `link_names` arg. Notice the 
warning shows up anyway.
   
   ### Operating System
   
   image: apache/airflow:2.5.3-python3.10
   
   ### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
   
   ```
   apache-airflow-providers-amazon==7.3.0
   apache-airflow-providers-celery==3.1.0
   apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==5.2.2
   apache-airflow-providers-common-sql==1.3.4
   apache-airflow-providers-docker==3.5.1
   apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch==4.4.0
   apache-airflow-providers-ftp==3.3.1
   apache-airflow-providers-google==8.11.0
   apache-airflow-providers-grpc==3.1.0
   apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp==3.3.0
   apache-airflow-providers-http==4.2.0
   apache-airflow-providers-imap==3.1.1
   apache-airflow-providers-mysql==4.0.2
   apache-airflow-providers-odbc==3.2.1
   apache-airflow-providers-postgres==5.4.0
   apache-airflow-providers-redis==3.1.0
   apache-airflow-providers-sendgrid==3.1.0
   apache-airflow-providers-sftp==4.2.4
   apache-airflow-providers-slack==7.2.0
   apache-airflow-providers-sqlite==3.3.1
   apache-airflow-providers-ssh==3.5.0
   ```
   
   ### Deployment
   
   Official Apache Airflow Helm Chart
   
   ### Deployment details
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Anything else
   
   Even though we're in the process of upgrading from 2.5.3 to 2.6.3, I read 
the code in main and believe this problem still exists.
   
   ### Are you willing to submit PR?
   
   - [X] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to