hussein-awala commented on PR #32990: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32990#issuecomment-1692364481
> so, it seems that sensors could always use the sensor timeout value to determine the appropriate deferral timeout to use. and such could be handled differentially by creating a new trigger subclass. and let execution_timeout continue to be applied independenty. This one also depends on how we decide to handle the timeout, if we decide to handle it in the triggerer (which I don't prefer). But for me, I imagine the TI tell the trigger: "hey, I need your to do X, and you have Y seconds to do that, after that I will not need you anymore", and the Trigger should not care about the reason, it should just do it's job, and stop after the timeout. WDYT? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
