kaxil commented on PR #35612: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35612#issuecomment-1809261660
Yup, this is why I had commented in the dev mailing list about not releasing the provider version. The chicked-egg situation with 2.8 Airflow core depending on that provider -- was only for FileTransferOperator as opposed to anything else. So actually we don't need to depend on it in the core, until we want to, to avoid chicken-egg. Since this (Airflow Object Storage) is such a new feature, I expect things to change for a bit since it is still evolving. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
