potiuk commented on PR #933: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/933#issuecomment-1889785426
Well. one comment here @dabla - I think you should not publish it under `apache-airlfow-providers`. While we do not have a way to prevent it - this might be misleading to publish it with the `apache-airflow-` prefix, that it is an Apache Software Foundation project. Since you are managing it on your own - I would strongly suggest you to choose a different name and remove the `apache-airflow-*` or - even better - remove it and pass the ownership of the project to the Apache Airflow organization so that it is not misused. This might change in the future, where organization and provenance of the packages in PyPi is more visible, also we do not have written rules about it, so this is more of a kind request rather than requirement, but I think it would be good to follow this approach - that is currently pretty much universal - where `apache-airflow-` prefix is for the projects that are managed by the Apache Airflow PMC. Would that be possible @dabla ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
