uranusjr commented on PR #37087: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37087#issuecomment-1974912444
To be short, I do not think we should add this. TriggerDagRunOperator is not special enough to warrant a separate type. The change is small in lines changed, but large in how it changes what DAG run type means in Airflow. If distinguishing different run sources in the grid view is this important (I am personally doubtful), it would be better to investigate ways to make this more generic, such as allowing user-defined custom types. I also have a feeling there may be a better way to achieve a similar end goal without touching DAG run types altogether. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
