jtv8 commented on issue #38762: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/38762#issuecomment-2043178028
Hi @ghjklw! I agree that it would be better to leverage the abstractions in the official Microsoft libraries - the current implementation is far too low level. However, that would require a substantial rewrite. I certainly don't have the time to do that, and to be honest even setting up a development environment and unit tests for the quick fix I've proposed is a bit beyond my comfort zone given my unfamiliarity with Airflow and its architecture. In an ideal world, I'd like to think Microsoft would contribute this work themselves, given that they now provide both Airflow and Databricks commercially as managed services, and one would expect them to work together via managed identities out of the box. Perhaps one of the project maintainers could kindly suggest it if they have open channels of communication with Microsoft about their commercial offerings? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
