Taragolis commented on code in PR #38711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38711#discussion_r1557226418
##########
airflow/exceptions.py:
##########
@@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ class
AirflowOptionalProviderFeatureException(AirflowException):
"""Raise by providers when imports are missing for optional provider
features."""
+class AirflowInternalRuntimeError(BaseException):
Review Comment:
`RuntimeError` and subclasses as well as `Exception` catch somewhere during
Non-DB preparation, in some cases it is do not affect tests cases in the other
make them flakey. This one decoupled into the separate PR:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38778 - the main idea, if test somewhere
access to the DB when it prohibited it should failed instead of ignore it and
go next, or marked as DB test
There is also different things which I've found during this attempt, some of
them already merged some of them wait their time
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]