potiuk commented on PR #41730: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41730#issuecomment-2312399140
> I am -0 on these changes. I will not block them if the community decides this is best, but I think changing a naming paradigm that has been in the community for years is not the best approach if we proceed with the user in mind. I think it's incumbent on the new feature to settle on a name that does not clash with existing names. This way users don't have the whiplash of a new paradigm to learn at the same time as relearning the old and getting confused between the two. This name change will cause unnecessary confusion, that is simply not needed. I think `distributed` is a good name and works perfectly well for the new feature being delivered. Agrew with @vincbeck. Naming is hard but I'd rather call the new executor "Distributed" rather than the reuse "old" name for it. Both namings are equally good IMHO and it's up to us to define them - so in this case it is the question of either adding new term, or reusing old term for something else and adding the new term for smth else. Sounds it has a lot potential for confusion.; -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
