amoghrajesh commented on code in PR #43934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/43934#discussion_r1842476561
##########
airflow/api_fastapi/core_api/routes/public/dags.py:
##########
@@ -303,3 +307,45 @@ def delete_dag(
status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT, f"Task instances of dag with id:
'{dag_id}' are still running"
)
return Response(status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
+
+
+@dags_router.get(
+ "/{dag_id}/assets/queuedEvent",
+ responses=create_openapi_http_exception_doc(
+ [
+ status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED,
+ status.HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN,
+ status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND,
+ ]
+ ),
+)
+def get_dag_asset_queued_events(
+ dag_id: str,
+ session: Annotated[Session, Depends(get_session)],
+ before: str = Query(None),
+) -> QueuedEventCollectionResponse:
+ """Get queued asset events for a DAG."""
+ where_clause = [AssetDagRunQueue.target_dag_id == dag_id]
+ if before:
+ before_parsed = timezone.parse(before)
+ where_clause.append(AssetDagRunQueue.created_at < before_parsed)
+ query = (
+ select(AssetDagRunQueue, AssetModel.uri)
+ .join(AssetModel, AssetDagRunQueue.asset_id == AssetModel.id)
+ .where(*where_clause)
+ )
+ result = session.execute(query).all()
Review Comment:
Yeah let me try that as well. The reason I didnt use that mainly was because
there's no real pagination for this.
limit, order_by etc dont exist in this context but I understand that I can
set those to None and make do.
Should we consider renaming the `paginated_select` function?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
