vincbeck commented on PR #44464: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/44464#issuecomment-2511890607
> Instead of waiting for #2 to happen, let's just copy/trim whatever minimal FAB stuff we need into the FAB provider now - just leave it completely separate from the old UI. Then we aren't blocked at all. That sounds good to me. That's a good idea indeed, we can save some time by doing this. Should we do it in a separate PR though? This one sets up the mechanism to embed Airflow 2 in Airflow 3 and the other PR(s) would be copying over the Flask app to Fab provider -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
