potiuk commented on issue #41641: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41641#issuecomment-2567886711
> It's not yet been discussed. Not sure whether there will be rules really need to be released that quickly since it's not actually breaking Airflow and rules can be ignored 🤔 True, that's why I am not **too** worried as this is just a "supplemental" code. And yeah - the plugin system is still in discussion i see, and I do not think we have strong enough case to "badly need" it - it's more that I generally do not like when "someone else" controls some airflow-specific code than Airlfow PMC. And this is not something I have against Astral, not at all, it's just we as PMC do not have final saying there, and someone else can add new rules or change ours - so that's a bit of a danger I see). Various scenarios here are possible - and it's just a little bit of an "itch" that I wonder if we should "scratch". -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
